yo yo yo search it!

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

this story may very well be there

but i didn't see it in any american papers

from the guardian

US general maps out strategic refit for Iraq, Middle East and Asia · Number of troops 'may be contributing to instability' · Public profile of ground forces to be lowered Richard Norton-TaylorTuesday February 7, 2006The Guardian
A senior US officer admitted yesterday that the presence of more than 300,000 foreign troops in the Middle East, most of them American, was a "contributory factor" to instability in the region.
The admission was made by Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt - a key strategist in the US central command covering the Middle East - as he spelled out the American military's plan to "reposture" its forces over an area stretching from Egypt in the west to Pakistan in the east, and from Kazakhstan in the north to Uganda in the south.
The US would "not maintain any long-term bases in Iraq" he said in a major speech to the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. "Our position is when we leave we will not have any bases there."
He did not speculate when that might be, though he said the US could not stay in the region for as long as its forces have remained in Germany or Japan. American troops are still deployed there 60 years after the end of the second world war.......

4 comments:

Graeme said...

the guardian kicks ass. I get all my news from them

Unknown said...

i've used them before but i am going to use them more frequently now.

Neil Shakespeare said...

Yup, time for a 'strategic redeployment' again. Gotta cover every country on Earth, looks like. As to there being no permanent bases in Iraq...well, I'd say that's bullshit. Well, I suppose when we take over Iran we could move them there...

Unknown said...

mr shakespeare's comment isn't showing on my blog when i call it up. in case you can't see it - here it is:
Yup, time for a 'strategic redeployment' again. Gotta cover every country on Earth, looks like. As to there being no permanent bases in Iraq...well, I'd say that's bullshit. Well, I suppose when we take over Iran we could move them there...

--
Posted by Neil Shakespeare to ravings of a semi-sane madwoman at 2/07/2006 05:07:30 PM

my reply is: depending upon who is in power in our monarchy, they may NOT be permanent bases in iraq. i think they are going to band together (the middle east) and attempt to kick our collective asses.