yo yo yo search it!

Saturday, February 11, 2006

sedition: Conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state.

along with ms berg, i too would have been guilty of sedition EXCEPT THERE IS NO REBELLION. where are our leaders with morals? our elected officials in congress (and the senate). why aren't they questioning the lies, the aggressive illegal actions taken by the bushwhacked administration? republicans AND democrats. this is beyond party lines. don't our elected representatives take oaths? at the very least don't they promise to protect their constituents? ms berg, i'll light a candle for you


Published on Friday, February 10, 2006 by the Progressive
VA Nurse Investigated for Sedition for Criticizing Bush
by Matthew Rothschild

Laura Berg is a clinical nurse specialist at the VA Medical Center in Albuquerque, where she has worked for 15 years.
Shortly after Katrina, she wrote a letter to the editor of the weekly paper the Alibi criticizing the Bush Administration.
After the paper published the letter in its September 15-21 issue, VA administrators seized her computer, alleged that she had written the letter on that computer, and accused her of “sedition.”
HereÂ’s what her letter said.
“I am furious with the tragically misplaced priorities and criminal negligence of this government,” it began. “The Katrina tragedy in the U.S. shows that the emperor has no clothes!” She mentioned that she was “a VA nurse” working with returning vets. “The public has no sense of the additional devastating human and financial costs of post-traumatic stress disorder,” she wrote, and she worried about the hundreds of thousands of additional cases that might result from Katrina and the Iraq War.
“Bush, Cheney, Chertoff, Brown, and Rice should be tried for criminal negligence,” she wrote. “This country needs to get out of Iraq now and return to our original vision and priorities of caring for land and people and resources rather than killing for oil. . . . We need to wake up and get real here, and act forcefully to remove a government administration playing games of smoke and mirrors and vicious deceit.
Otherwise, many more of us will be facing living hell in these times.”
After her computer was seized, Berg wrote a memo to her bosses seeking information and an explanation.
Mel Hooker, chief of the human resources management service at the Albuquerque VA, wrote Berg back on November 9 and acknowledged that “your personal computer files did not contain the editorial letter written to the editor of the weekly Alibi.”
But rather than apologize, he leveled the sedition charge: “The Agency is bound by law to investigate and pursue any act which potentially represents sedition,” he said. “In your letter . . . you declared yourself ‘as a VA nurse’ and publicly declared the Government which employs you to have ‘tragically misplaced priorities and criminal negligence’ and advocated, ‘act forcefully to remove a government administration playing games of smoke and mirrors and vicious deceit.’ ”
Berg, who is not talking to the press, is “scared for her job” and “pretty emotionally distressed,” says Peter Simonson, executive director of the ACLU of New Mexico.
“We were shocked to see the word ‘sedition’ used,” Simonson tells The Progressive. “Sedition? That’s like something out of the history books.”
In a press release, Simonson also said: “Is this government so jealous of its power, so fearful of dissent, that it needs to threaten people who openly oppose its policies with charges of ‘sedition’?”
The ACLU of New Mexico is working in Berg’s behalf. It has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for documents relating to this incident. And it is asking “at the very least” that Berg “receive a pubic apology from Mr. Hooker to remedy the unconstitutional chilling effect on the speech of VA employees that has resulted from these intimidating tactics,” according to a letter from the New Mexico ACLU to the VA’s Office of Regional Counsel............

2 comments:

Rory Shock said...

The definitions of words in laws don't seem to mean jack shit to the executive branch right now. "Use of force" against an enemy, according to them, means eavesdropping on Americans. So, I would expect them to essentially say, "sedition" is whatever we say it is, and if you are saying something critical of bushcheney, then that is seditious ... frankly if they had their way, people here at home speaking freely would be bombed in their houses or sent to Gitmo for torture ... how bushcheney get away with treating those that they can do that to shows how they would treat everyone if they could get away with it ... kinda like the Nazis in how cut off they seem to be from feelings eliciting compassion and decency ...

Unknown said...

and why are the people who CAN do something about it not making their voices heard?