yo yo yo search it!

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

this story gives you a warm fuzzy feeling ALL over

NOT

instead of worrying about swearing on television or spying on peace activists (and vegetarians) or bombing mosques, why don't we WATCH OUR OWN BORDERS?????????


Investigators enter US with 'dirty-bomb' material


Mon Mar 27, 11:35 PM ET
Four years after the September 11 attacks, investigators were able to easily enter the United States with enough radioactive material to make two so-called dirty bombs, according to a report on a government undercover investigation obtained on Monday.
Two teams made simultaneous entries at the U.S.-Mexican border and the border with Canada carrying radioactive material in their vehicles in December 2005, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in the report on its investigation.
The congressional watchdog agency said the test was designed to examine potential weaknesses related to radiation monitors that have been installed at U.S. border ports of entry, the GAO said.
The monitors worked. But the investigators, posing as employees of a fictitious, still got past the border patrol with fake paperwork authorizing them to transport the material, the report said..
"The CBP (Customs and Border Patrol) inspectors never questioned the authenticity of the investigators' counterfeit bill of lading or the counterfeit NRC (Nuclear Regulatory Commission) authorizing them to receive, acquire, possess and transfer radioactive sources," the GAO said in a letter to Sen. Norm Coleman (news, bio, voting record), chairman of a Senate Homeland Security subcommittee.
"We believe the amount of radioactive sources that we were able to transport into the United States during our operation would be sufficient to produce two dirty bombs, which could be used as weapons of mass disruption," the letter said.
Coleman, a Minnesota Republican, requested the investigation. His subcommittee has scheduled a hearing on Tuesday to examine how the United States is guarding against nuclear and radiological threats
.
A spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security was not immediately available for comment.......

Radioactive Matter Gets Into U.S. in Test


By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 4 minutes ago
Installing radiation detectors at U.S. entry points is taking too long and costing too much, says a congressional watchdog agency whose undercover investigators breached security by slipping nuclear material into the United States.
In a test last year, the small amounts of cesium-137, which is used in industrial gauges, triggered radiation alarms in Texas and Washington state. The material was enough to make two small "dirty bombs," officials said, yet U.S. customs agents permitted the investigators to enter the United States because they were tricked with counterfeit documents.
The Bush administration says that within 45 days it will give U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents the tools they need to verify such documents in the future.
Senators were to grill administration officials on security problems identified during the Government Accounting Office's undercover operation during a Senate Homeland Security subcommittee hearing Tuesday.
In a series of reports, the GAO, which is the investigative arm of Congress, found that the Homeland Security Department's goal of installing 3,034 radiation detectors by September 2009 across the United States — at border crossings, seaports, airports and mail facilities — was "unlikely."
Investigators also said the government probably will spend $342 million more than it expects to complete the job, given its current costs and pace. Between October 2000 and October 2005, they said, the government spent about $286 million installing radiation monitors inside the United States.
"We suffer from a massive 'blind spot' in our cargo security measures," Sen. Norm Coleman (news, bio, voting record), R-Minn., said in a statement.........

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think border security is a damned joke, all this expense for the war on terror and yet people can transport radioactive materials around.

Regarding your comments, on posting news- I did not express myself well on that one and certainly did not have anyone at all like you in mind because I realize you post so it can be discussed. I am talking about people who say they are PROVIDING content when they are STEALING content and taking credit for it in some cases. It isn't the posting of news, and we all should post whatever the hell we feel like posting. I am referring to people that claim that THEY are providing news then cut and paste which is kind of like plagiarism in my opinion. I read many blogs of different sorts, and sometimes I see the same words VERBATIM theifed shamelessly right off another blog. I have even run across my own comments copied, although I would tend to feel sorry for somebody using words from ME.

In any case I am what I am, which is opinionated. And sometimes I don't leave comments at all- I think I am referring more to blogwhores that don't even read the posts but want to basically say "I was here, now come hither." Pointless use of time.

Neil Shakespeare said...

Fuck Norm Coleman. To think that pigfucker is head of the Senate committe on Homeland Security is scaring the shit out of me.

rev. billy bob gisher ©2008 said...

why? because we are easy to watch that other stuff is hard!

neil, neil, neil,perhaps if you added just a little profanity to your rants it might pump up your arguement. stop being so reserved.

Unknown said...

our priorities are not in good places that's for sure. we (well they) speak of national security yet they keep newspaper reporters on no fly lists (for reasons yet to be determined) and want to turn out ports over to the uae. it's like i'm screaming and my voice is so hoarse no one can hear me anymore

and rev, i try not to swear too much on the blog (i do once in a while) but if you were ever around me in person, you'd have to run away screaming RIGHT QUICK

Rory Shock said...

man, here we go again with priorities ... yeah ... wouldn't it make more sense to defend the "homeland" by actually defending it as opposed to creating every day in Iraq hundreds of new people highly motivated to kill U.S. north americans ... it would have ... why the ... f ... should it take so many years to do this? 'cause all the resources are going to the war? what a bunch of h-s

Unknown said...

(i meant to say turn OUR ports over in my comment above)

mr shock you're of course correct. we're makin' friends WHEREVER we go!