hmmmmm how can this be????????

only SOME life is worth saving???????? not ALL life????? where is the justification i ask ye??? why is a fertilized egg worthy of saving and not a BORN person??? lucy............ you got some 'splainin' to doooooooooooooooooooo
In South Dakota it's ''Sanctity of Life,'' so Time for First Execution in 60 Years by A. Alexander, March 25th, 2006
South Dakota has officially joined the surreal world of right-wing hypocritical insanity. Only days ago, the state became the nation's first to unconstitutionally outlaw any and all abortions except for in the case -- well, there weren't any exceptions. This law, the South Dakota Republicans insisted, affirmed their unyielding belief in the "sanctity of life." Fast-forward a week or so, and the same so-called "pro-lifers" are making ready to kill their first person in more than 60 years.Now, in fairness to South Dakota's Republicans, this particular inmate seems to want to die. However, if they were truly "pro-life" GOPers, they'd kindly tell the guy that Republicans care too much about the "sanctity of life" to allow his execution. Sadly, they won't!No, it is more likely that South Dakota Republicans will encourage, trumpet, and demand the inmate be murdered by the State. It is, after all, the Republican way. Oppose abortion based upon some shadowy interpretation of their Christian faith that says all life is sacred, then turn right around and celebrate the murder of people who've murdered people. ............