yo yo yo search it!

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

seems like what's good for ONE goose, not only isn't good for the gander

BUT isn't good for another goose either.

if they don't like the rules, they JUST CHANGE 'EM. what's wrong with that? PLENTY

why is the gonze still in office? for that matter, why are we allowing the king and his court to still rule?

as i always say to my (beloved) red sox

S
W

E
E
P
('em ALL out)

Residency Clause Adds Fuel To Dispute Over U.S. Attorneys
One Prosecutor Gets an Exemption, Another Gets Fired



By Dan Eggen Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, May 2, 2007; Page A03
On Nov. 10, 2005, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales sent a letter to a federal judge in Montana, assuring him that the U.S. attorney there, William W. Mercer, was not violating federal law by spending most of his time in Washington as a senior Justice Department official.
That same day, Mercer had a GOP Senate staffer insert into a bill a provision that would change the rules so that federal prosecutors could live outside their districts to serve in other jobs, according to documents and interviews.......


.........But the episode, which received little notice at the time, provides another example in which Gonzales's statements appear to conflict with simultaneous actions by his aides in connection with U.S. attorney policies. Lawmakers investigating the department's handling of the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys have repeatedly accused Gonzales of being less than truthful about the roles played by himself and the White House...................

No comments: