why don't we put HALLIBURTON in charge of our ports???????? let's just further open our pockets to them. why this continues to go on with most of us being silent is beyond my comprehension.
Army to pay Halliburton unit most of disputed costs
02/26/2006 @ 10:36 pm Filed by RAW STORY
A disputed no-bid contract in Iraq which Pentagon auditors determined contained "excessive" charges will be paid for almost in full by the Army, according to a story set for the front page of Monday's New York Times, RAW STORY has learned.
Excerpts from the article written by James Glanz:
#
The Army has decided to reimburse a Halliburton subsidiary for nearly all of its costs on a disputed $2.41 billion no-bid contract to deliver fuel and repair oil equipment in Iraq, even though the Pentagon's own auditors had identified more than $250 million in charges as potentially excessive or unjustified.....................
4 comments:
Sure! Let's just pay 'em anyway! We're an endless supply of money, so why not give it to Cheney's boys?
we are anyway........
I agree, why have the middlemen? They're just a stage front anyway..
You know I think if all of us just give $20 or $50 to you and Lily ,( or whatever the Spirit leads us to give), You and her can go up to NY and those big bullies and start kicking some esoteric butt!
just a thought
aj, it's a deal (well i have to check with lily first). i'd LOVE to kick some proverbial buttocks AND i'm damn good at it too
Post a Comment