i have never in my life heard anything so

immoral, so unjust, so fucked up. i don't mean (necessarily) the alleged rapist being found not guilty ( IF IT WAS BASED ON REAL SOLID EVIDENCE). i mean him being found not guilty because he said the victim's jeans were too tight for him to remove without her help. i mean a doctor said there was evidence of physical trauma. no. he was found NOT guilty.

what the fuck????????????????/

ONCE AGAIN, BLAME THE WOMAN FOR WEARING TOO TIGHT CLOTHING. SHE ASKED FOR IT. SHE WANTED IT AND SHE HELPED ME WITH IT...........

Jettison the tight jeans legal furphy

• Jill Singer
• From: Herald Sun

AUSTRALIA has been put on the international legal map over a court case involving the bizarre question of whether jeans can be a barrier to rape.

Nicholas Gonzales, 23, was recently acquitted of rape after a jury raised questions about how his alleged victim's jeans came to be removed.

The woman testified that she had met Gonzales in a Sydney bar and accompanied him to his flat to listen to some music - but said he overpowered and raped her there.

Gonzales argued the sex was consensual and that the woman, who weighs a mere 42kg, was wearing tight jeans that would be difficult to remove without her collaboration.

After Gonzales was found not guilty he applied for his costs to be paid by the state. In dismissing his application, the judge this week said she found the medical evidence of sexual assault "compelling" and pointed out that Dr Rosemary Isaacs had examined the complainant and found evidence of physical trauma................