yo yo yo search it!

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

an editorial

you should read.
(why is it i hear checkov saying, 'captain, i had no idea where the nuclear wessels were')?

Navy veteran questions why six nuclear missiles were flown on combat aircraft to staging area for Middle East
John Byrne
A retired lieutenant commander in the Navy Reserve who served with the Navy's Supervisor of Salvage questioned in a little-noticed editorial Sunday why six active nuclear armed cruise missiles were being transferred to an active bomber base that "just happens to be the staging area for Middle Eastern operations."
"The United States also does not transport nuclear weapons meant for elimination attached to their launch vehicles under the wings of a combat aircraft," Navy veteran Robert Stormer wrote in the Texas-based Star-Telegram. "The procedure is to separate the warhead from the missile, encase the warhead and transport it by military cargo aircraft to a repository -- not an operational bomber base that just happens to be the staging area for Middle Eastern operations."
Six nuclear W80 nuclear-armed cruise missiles were flown to Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana where they sat for ten hours undetected.
"Press reports initially cited the Air Force mistake of flying nuclear weapons over the United States in violation of Air Force standing orders and international treaties, while completely missing the more important major issues, such as how six nuclear cruise missiles got loose to begin with," writes Stormer................


(p.s. i have FRIENDS in minot. as a matter of fact, i almost had to GO to minot - for work - but ended up NOT having to go. i think the fact i refused to get on a plane in the middle of winter flying into temperatures WELL below zero had something to do with it)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I might have to quibble with this article a bit. As someone who has worked around nukes, had to memorize the procedures and regulations concerning them, has been stationed at Minot, and has been to Barksdale, I think the author of the story has missed a lot of important elements.

First of all, it is impossible to transport nukes under the wing of a B-52. Secondly, while there are standing orders against transporting armed nukes by air, and there are international treaties to that effect, it is not against regs or laws to transport unarmed nukes in enclosed fixed-wing transport aircraft.

Fact of the matter is that we spent decades of the cold war with a fully armed platform bomber airborne in case a retaliatory strike became necessary . . . decades where the plane was always in the air and didn't land until it's replacement was at cruising altitude. Over U.S. soil, by the way.

This story is a bit of hype. I heard about it and my immediate reaction was, "So?"

Unknown said...

rick, i did hear about it a while ago and also said, yeah? i was sure it had happened a zillion times before. i wanted to post this because it came from someone (sort of) inside.

sorry you were in minot (but i think i've said that before)