yo yo yo search it!

Friday, July 25, 2008

this man has been judged


AND CONVICTED of raping a child (convicted of way more than that actually). this man was SENTENCED TO 43 YEARS. yet, a judge has continued to let this CONVICTED CHILD RAPIST RUN AROUND FREE. he has NOT SERVED ONE SINGLE DAY of his sentence. fuck, even paris hilton served some time.
this judge has pissed me off even more than that one who let the child molester off easy BECAUSE HE WAS SHORT (yes, that's true. i've posted about it)

if you live in florida (even if you don't), i would stronly urge you to write to 'judge' marc gold. his decision is absolutely OUTRAGEOUS and beyond belief


http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/23/sex.offender.teacher/index.html">

Child molester hasn't served single day of 43-year prison term


By Ashley Fantz
(CNN) -- For nearly two years, the South Florida middle school art teacher forced the boy to have sex in a classroom supply closet.

Sometimes, Aaron Mohanlal would call in sick to work, take the boy to his home for sex and drop the seventh-grader back off at school at the end of the day.

To keep the abuse secret, Mohanlal bought the 13-year-old a cell phone and created nicknames for their genitalia. When police arrested him, the teacher was caught on hidden video trying to destroy letters threatening the boy if he ever told.

Last summer, a Broward County jury convicted Mohanlal of 13 counts, including child abuse, molestation and lewd battery, and a judge sentenced him to 43 years.

But a year later, Mohanlal has yet to spend a day in prison.

"I can't understand why he isn't behind bars," said the victim, now 18. The network is not disclosing his name because it doesn't identify sexual assault victims.................



.............."The idea of that monster being that close to my family again is outrageous," said the boy's father, who is often so overwhelmed with rage and sadness that he drives to a park, leans against a tree and sobs.

"What did we go through a trial for?" he said...........


...........

Post-conviction bonds are rarely given in criminal trials, but judges occasionally grant them if there was a procedural error during trial that would make a conviction reversal at the appellate level likely, legal experts say.

But there were no procedural mistakes during Mohanlal's trial, both prosecutor Anita White and defense attorney Steve Rossi said................

No comments: