we can rest easy tonight

my friend dj tony and i were discussing why NO ONE is in jail yet over the valerie plame outing. it's been going on forever and NO ONE has come to justice. this, in my opinion was treasonous. a covert cia operative was named IN PRINT (novak was on tv and we HAD to change it. we couldn't stand looking at his pouchy puss). now the justice department is going to be all over the nyt for DOING THEIR JOB (at least for once. late, but they did it never the less)? we all KNEW it was going on. i sure did and i am no where near as in the know as the senators and congress people are. they feign surprise. outrage, YES. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. don't let this administration step all over our constitution. it IS more than a piece of paper. it's the blueprint for our existence. White House Says Justice Dept. Probing 'NYT' On Its Own By TONI LOCY, Associated Press Writer Published: December 30, 2005 Updated 8 p.m.
WASHINGTON The Justice Department has opened another investigation into leaks of classified information, this time to determine who divulged the existence of President Bush's secret domestic spying program. The inquiry focuses on disclosures to The New York Times about warrantless surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, officials said. The newspaper recently revealed the existence of the program in a front-page story that also acknowledged that the news had been withheld from publication for a year, partly at the request of the administration and partly because the newspaper wanted more time to confirm various aspects of the program. White House spokesman Trent Duffy said Justice undertook the action on its own, and Bush was informed of it Friday. ``The leaking of classified information is a serious issue. The fact is that al-Qaida's playbook is not printed on Page One and when America's is, it has serious ramifications,'' Duffy told reporters in Crawford, Texas, where Bush was spending the holidays. Catherine Mathis, a spokeswoman for the Times, declined to comment. An article in the Times on Saturday said that Executive Editor Bill Keller also declined comment. ..............