yo yo yo search it!

Thursday, October 20, 2005

don't act tough NOW

senate members - only to APPROVE the bio-tch in the future. take your vaginas outta your mamma's handbags and JUST EFFING SAY NO (now). geeze the woman was never a judge. geeze she was a lotto commissioner (nothing wrong with that BUT it is NO basis for a supreme court justice). doesn't a former thoroughbred horse association officer who was appointed to a certain government position WAY OVER HIS HEAD ring any bells?

Miers Is Asked to Redo Reply to Questions


By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Published: October 20, 2005
WASHINGTON, Oct. 19 - The Supreme Court nomination of Harriet E. Miers suffered another setback on Wednesday when the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee asked her to resubmit parts of her judicial questionnaire, saying various members had found her responses "inadequate," "insufficient" and "insulting." Senators Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the committee chairman, and Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the senior Democrat, sent Ms. Miers a letter faulting what they called incomplete responses about her legal career, her work in the White House, her potential conflicts on cases involving the administration and the suspension of her license by the District of Columbia Bar.
Their letter also asked her to provide detailed accounts of private reassurances about her views given by the White House or its allies to some conservative supporters who have been anxious about her positions on abortion and other social issues.
The letter asked Ms. Miers to respond within a week. Mr. Specter said he had scheduled hearings on her confirmation to begin Nov. 7, overruling Democratic objections that they did not have enough information to evaluate her because of her scant record on constitutional issues before joining the White House. Both Mr. Specter and Mr. Leahy said they would not set any deadline for the conclusion of the hearings.
"If the questions are not answered or their answer is incomplete, as they have been, then it's going to be a long hearing indeed," Mr. Leahy said..........

No comments: