yo yo yo search it!

Saturday, June 14, 2008

why?

why did we invade iraq?
why did we allow our leaders to lie to us?
why are we not punishing our leaders for lying to us (we HAVE PROOF)?
why are we allowing our leaders to continue in office?
why did we allow 4,098 of our men and women die in iraq?
why did we allow goddess knows how many (innocent) iraqis die?
why did we allow goddess knows how many (innocent) iraqis to become displaced?
why did we allow our troops to (unjustly, immorally, illegally) invade a country without proper protection (armor, armored vehicles, etc)?
why are we allowing our troops that physically come home lay in squalor or limbo if they need medical help (including that of the mind)?
why?
why?
why?
why?
why?

Key Iraqi Leaders Deliver Setbacks to U.S.
Premier Rejects Terms of Proposed Pacts; Cleric Reactivates Militia


By Amit R. Paley and Karen DeYoung Washington Post Foreign Service
BAGHDAD, June 13 -- The Bush administration's Iraq policy suffered two major setbacks Friday when Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki publicly rejected key U.S. terms for an ongoing military presence and anti-American Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr called for a new militia offensive against U.S. forces.
During a visit to Jordan, Maliki said negotiations over initial U.S. proposals for bilateral political and military agreements had "reached a dead end." While he said talks would continue, his comments fueled doubts that the pacts could be reached this year, before the Dec. 31 expiration of a
United Nations mandate sanctioning the U.S. role in Iraq.
The moves by two of Iraq's most powerful Shiite leaders underscore how the presence of U.S. troops has become a central issue for Iraqi politicians as they position themselves for provincial elections later this year. Iraqis across the political spectrum have grown intolerant of the U.S. presence, but the dominant Shiite parties -- including Maliki's Dawa party -- are especially fearful of an electoral challenge from new, grass-roots groups. ,,,,,,,,

No comments: