i'm thinking king george

probably doesn't have the balls to say the shite he's been saying late last week - IF he were back home in the good ol' u s of a. oh, the king has balls all right. he lies to benefit his friends and himself. he sent 4,071 men and women to their deaths for NO reason (NOT counting all of the innocents killed and maimed in iraq). he's destroying our earth without a second thought. he's giving REAL terrorists pats on the back. he's spitting in the faces of every 'regular' american woman and man. he doesn't give two shites about health care or education. he's ballsy all right. BUT i still don't think he'd say what he said about barack obama if he was HERE

Outrage overload continues

You have to give George W. Bush credit, in a “My, that leech certainly sucks blood well,” sort of way. Just when you think he can’t get any lower, he proves you wrong.

Every single time.

Before yesterday, I would have happily sworn on a first edition copy of Darwin’s On the Origin of the Species that Bush simply couldn’t act any more despicably in playing the “terrorism” card than he already has. Surely, I foolishly believed, there must be a saturation point for such things — a low that’s so low that it simply can’t be outdone.

Consider, after all, the dreary parade of his past dishonor.

Manipulating public fear of terrorism for political gain?

Been there, done that.

Falsely besmirching the patriotism of political opponents?

Oh, please! That’s just so 2002!

Using terrorism alerts to scare people when it’s politically helpful?

Just another day at the office.

Arguing that Americans must surrender their sacred freedoms in order to be safe from attack?

Does the phrase standard operating procedure mean anything to you?

Using the fear of terrorism to perpetrate a fraud on the nation leading to a disastrous war in Iraq?.............