hackles up. we have many enemies. (qaddafi springs to mind as does some of the 'leaders' in saudi arabia as does china as does many other places). yet we MUST attack iraq because they posed an imminent threat? who the f**k do they think is STILL buying this - cause they're still saying it?
Key architect of Iraq war defends case for US-led invasion
An influential architect of the war in Iraq defended the case for US military action on Monday, saying the failure to find weapons of mass destruction did not mean the decision to invade was a mistake.
Douglas Feith, former undersecretary of defense for policy from 2001 to 2005, said Saddam Hussein posed a serious threat to the United States due to his links to terrorist groups and his regime's potential to produce biological and chemical weapons.
"And even based on what we have learned since, even though we didn't find the WMD stockpiles that the CIA had said we would find in Iraq, what we did find ... was a serious WMD threat in Iraq because Saddam had maintained programs for biological and chemical weapons," Feith said at a news conference promoting his new memoir, "War and Decision."
Feith said government documents show the Iraqi dictator had experts and resources in place so that his regime could manufacture chemical and biological weapons within three to five weeks..........
DEBTOCRACY- A GREEK FILM WITH LESSONS FOR IRELAND
13 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment