i am NOT a fan of playboy and penthouse. they more than demean women. they portray beauty (and sensuality and sex and attractiveness) as being only ONE way. i don't mind 'pornography' at all. i mind HOW women and WHAT women are portrayed in the playboys and the penthouses of the world.
IF our military men and women want access to those types of magazines, IT'S THEIR RIGHT to have them. they are allowed to torture and kill and maim but they're not allowed to get a stiffy?
bullshite on that
(and oh, this headline is certainly worthy of the ny post, isn't it? but it ain't the post)
Legislation aims to jack soldiers' 'off time' reading materials
Nick Langewis
"Pro-family" organizations and members of Congress are continuing the push to limit the range of reading materials available to members of the military.
House Rep. Paul Broun (GA-10), with 15 co-sponsors and the support of organizations such as the Alliance Defense Fund and the American Family Association, recently introduced a bill that would strengthen the ban on sales of adult-themed publications on U.S. military installations.
While the National Defense Authorization Act of 1997 bans the sale of "sexually explicit material" on property under Department of Defense jurisdiction, the Pentagon doesn't consider certain items explicit enough to take off of base store shelves; a certain percentage of a film or magazine's content would have to be considered "sexually explicit" for sale or rental to be barred.,............
3 comments:
We don't have the right to determine our own morality . . . we have the right to fight so that "others" may determine our morality for us.
This shit is so silly it ain't even funny.
damn straight bb.
right rick, right........
(p.s. i don't know what happened to this posting. as i'm looking at it now, there are weird things happening. headlines and link disappearing. i know i posted it correctly. maybe blogger is sick this morning)
Post a Comment