she's baaaaaaaaaaaack (well she never went away)

i really don't get this. when that f**kwad king george took away our freedoms and our libertys this piece o' steamin' shite didn't say a word. now that a democrat (and i don't consider him as being too 'liberal' at all. he's made some mighty mighty conservative choices since being our president. sure, he's made some non conservative ones too. there's a mix going on. it's all fine by me SO LONG AS KING GEORGE'S REIGN IS OVER) is in office the country is going to hell in a handbasket (well it is but due to a BUNCH of things, democrats in power is NOT one of them. ) because we're on the road to socialism? no babe, we're NOT on the road to socialism. we're actually getting some of our freedoms back you stupid bio-tch you

soooooooooooooooo

why isn't faux (and to be fair most of the OTHER msm 'news' sources) asking if sarevil is a SOCIALIST? (hmmmmmmmmm seems like there is ACTUAL PROOF that she IS, no??????). every time she calls barack obama a socialist, why doesn't anyone shout out what's in the following excerpt from a new yorker article? huh?

Sarah Palin, proud socialist

Posted by Mark Frauenfelder,
..........The best part of Hendrik Hertzberg's excellent New Yorker commentary about McCain and Palin's failed attempt to convince people that Obama is a socialist is the final paragraph containing this boast from Gov. Sarah Palin:

The state that she governs has no income or sales tax. Instead, it imposes huge levies on the oil companies that lease its oil fields. The proceeds finance the government’s activities and enable it to issue a four-figure annual check to every man, woman, and child in the state. One of the reasons Palin has been a popular governor is that she added an extra twelve hundred dollars to this year’s check, bringing the per-person total to $3,269. A few weeks before she was nominated for Vice-President, she told a visiting journalist—Philip Gourevitch, of this magazine—that “we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” Perhaps there is some meaningful distinction between spreading the wealth and sharing it (“collectively,” no less), but finding it would require the analytic skills of Karl the Marxist........